Resolv Governance Is Live
Nov 19, 2025
When Resolv launched in 2024, it started with a simple idea: build a safer, more reliable way to generate stable, risk-managed returns on-chain. In a year, that idea has grown into a financial layer used across multiple markets, clusters, and partners with hundreds of millions in assets relying on Resolv’s stability.
As the protocol matured, one thing became clear:
the way decisions are made must evolve with the system itself.
Today, Resolv Governance goes live, introduced gradually, designed deliberately, and built to reflect how the protocol actually operates:
measured, transparent, accessible, and aligned with long-term growth.
Why governance, and why now
Resolv now touches multiple sources of yield, collateral types, integrations, and risk surfaces. Decisions about collateral composition, yield sources, reward allocations, emissions, and fees have material impact on both institutions and retail users.
A structured governance framework provides:
Clear responsibility for decisions that shape the protocol
Predictability and transparency around changes
A path for contributors and partners to help steer development
Better alignment with the institutions that now rely on Resolv for stable yield
A governance approach built for the long term
It builds on the best practices already proven across the ecosystem: clear roles, clean processes, and tools designed for high-quality decision-making.
Governance will roll out in phases, starting with what matters most right now.
In scope for the initial phase:
Token rewards: point campaign parameters, allocation of rewards to stRESOLV holders, grant program updates.
Protocol operations: collateral pool composition, fees, and risk parameters.
Wider scope of governance will be considered once it shows consistent participation and proposal quality.
How it works
Governance follows a simple, two-layer structure:
Discussion → Voting
1. Discussion:
All proposals begin in Discord forum, where contributors and community members can review, question, and refine.
2. Voting: Once discussion is complete, proposals move to Snapshot, where all holders of staked RESOLV (stRESOLV) can vote. Gasless, off-chain.
Proposal creation begins with the core team to set quality benchmarks. Community-submitted proposals will open in later phases with defined templates and guardrails.
What this unlocks
Governance is a major milestone in Resolv becoming the financial layer it aims to be.
It brings:
Transparent, well-structured decision-making
Strong alignment between protocol economics and tokenholders
A foundation for broader ecosystem participation
This is the starting point for a system designed to evolve as the protocol grows.
Resolv is entering its next phase. Now, the community steps into it.
First proposal: ETHFI distribution
The first governance proposal (RGP-01) covers the distribution of 120,000 ETHFI earned from Resolv’s exposure to weETH via EtherFi.
It introduces a shift toward:
ecosystem-driven partner rewards → and away from pure emissions-based incentives.
Voting process:
→ Stake RESOLV to participate
→ Discuss RGP-01 on Discord
When Resolv launched in 2024, it started with a simple idea: build a safer, more reliable way to generate stable, risk-managed returns on-chain. In a year, that idea has grown into a financial layer used across multiple markets, clusters, and partners with hundreds of millions in assets relying on Resolv’s stability.
As the protocol matured, one thing became clear:
the way decisions are made must evolve with the system itself.
Today, Resolv Governance goes live, introduced gradually, designed deliberately, and built to reflect how the protocol actually operates:
measured, transparent, accessible, and aligned with long-term growth.
Why governance, and why now
Resolv now touches multiple sources of yield, collateral types, integrations, and risk surfaces. Decisions about collateral composition, yield sources, reward allocations, emissions, and fees have material impact on both institutions and retail users.
A structured governance framework provides:
Clear responsibility for decisions that shape the protocol
Predictability and transparency around changes
A path for contributors and partners to help steer development
Better alignment with the institutions that now rely on Resolv for stable yield
A governance approach built for the long term
It builds on the best practices already proven across the ecosystem: clear roles, clean processes, and tools designed for high-quality decision-making.
Governance will roll out in phases, starting with what matters most right now.
In scope for the initial phase:
Token rewards: point campaign parameters, allocation of rewards to stRESOLV holders, grant program updates.
Protocol operations: collateral pool composition, fees, and risk parameters.
Wider scope of governance will be considered once it shows consistent participation and proposal quality.
How it works
Governance follows a simple, two-layer structure:
Discussion → Voting
1. Discussion:
All proposals begin in Discord forum, where contributors and community members can review, question, and refine.
2. Voting: Once discussion is complete, proposals move to Snapshot, where all holders of staked RESOLV (stRESOLV) can vote. Gasless, off-chain.
Proposal creation begins with the core team to set quality benchmarks. Community-submitted proposals will open in later phases with defined templates and guardrails.
What this unlocks
Governance is a major milestone in Resolv becoming the financial layer it aims to be.
It brings:
Transparent, well-structured decision-making
Strong alignment between protocol economics and tokenholders
A foundation for broader ecosystem participation
This is the starting point for a system designed to evolve as the protocol grows.
Resolv is entering its next phase. Now, the community steps into it.
First proposal: ETHFI distribution
The first governance proposal (RGP-01) covers the distribution of 120,000 ETHFI earned from Resolv’s exposure to weETH via EtherFi.
It introduces a shift toward:
ecosystem-driven partner rewards → and away from pure emissions-based incentives.
Voting process: